Skip to main content

Home and Community Support

Providing everything from a little help to specialised care, our flexible Home and Community Support services cover home nursing, home assistance and allied health.

Learn more

Home Care Package calculator

Plan your Home Care Package by choosing the services that meet your needs and interests.

Get started

Specialised services

From community education programs to research and digital innovation, we co-design services to support you to live your life, your way.

Learn more
Adjust font size

Interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of older people living alone: a mixed-methods systematic review of effectiveness and accessibility

Johnstone, G., Dickins, M., Lowthian, J., Renehan, E., Enticott, J., Mortimer, D., & Ogrin, R. (n.d.). Interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of older people living alone: A mixed-methods systematic review of effectiveness and accessibility. Ageing and Society, 1-50. doi:10.1017/S0144686X19001818


The global population is ageing and the likelihood of living alone increases with age. Services are necessary to help older people living alone to optimise health and wellbeing.

This systematic review aimed to summarise the effectiveness and accessibility of interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of older people living alone. Relevant electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus) were searched for all years up to August 2018. Studies were included if they involved older people (aged ⩾55 years) living alone, and an intervention with measured health and wellbeing outcomes. All study types were included.

The Theory of Access was used to assess interventions across dimensions of accessibility, availability, acceptability, affordability, adequacy and awareness. Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria; 17 studies focused on ageing safely in place and 11 on psychological and social wellbeing. Studies comprised quantitative (N = 19), qualitative (N = 4) and mixed-methods (N = 5) approaches. Dimensions from the Theory of Access were poorly addressed in the studies, particularly those of higher-quality methodology. Studies were heterogeneous, preliminary in scope and lacked consistent study design, methodology or measurement. Services that do not address user accessibility in design or evaluation may be limited in their uptake and impact. It is recommended that dimensions of access and co-creation principles be integrated into service design processes and be evaluated alongside clinical effectiveness.

Read the full article here.